PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDL vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMDL

1D
4.30%
1M
94.72%
YTD
357.43%
6M
344.84%
1Y
1,145.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
0.35%
1M
6.98%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and NTSD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMDLNTSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

8.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

43.27

AMDL vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMDLNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

5.75

-5.24

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDLNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-5.20%

-83.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.67%

-0.84%

-47.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.53%

Volatility

AMDL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDLNTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.36%

24.31%

+105.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.58%

24.31%

+92.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.58%

24.31%

+92.27%

AMDL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

AMDL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMDL and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDL and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer