AMDL vs. NTSD
AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
AMDL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMDL
- 1D
- 4.30%
- 1M
- 94.72%
- YTD
- 357.43%
- 6M
- 344.84%
- 1Y
- 1,145.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 462.29% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDL and NTSD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
AMDL
NTSD
AMDL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 8.96 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.75 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.99 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 5.75 | -5.24 |
Drawdowns
AMDL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -5.20% | -83.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.67% | -0.84% | -47.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.53% | — | — |
Volatility
AMDL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 129.36% | 24.31% | +105.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.58% | 24.31% | +92.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.58% | 24.31% | +92.27% |
AMDL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMDL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.
AMDL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMDL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for AMDL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer