AMDL vs. ADBG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AMDL is passively managed, while ADBG is actively managed. Over the past year, AMDL returned 455.89% vs -67.64% for ADBG. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. AMDL charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ADBG.

Performance

AMDL vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a 282.51% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -62.04% return.

AMDL

• 1D: -10.82%
• 1M: -7.65%
• 6M: 241.84%
• YTD: 282.51%
• 1Y: 455.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ADBG

• 1D: 9.60%
• 1M: 25.57%
• 6M: -49.08%
• YTD: -62.04%
• 1Y: -67.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	282.51%	174.25%
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	-62.04%	-29.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and ADBG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	-0.03

The correlation between AMDL and ADBG shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 91
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

ADBG

ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 2
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDL	ADBG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.34	-0.94	+4.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	-1.58	+4.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	0.81	+0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.19	-0.86	+9.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.79	-1.46	+17.25

AMDL vs. ADBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the ADBG Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and ADBG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than ADBG's maximum drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and ADBG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	ADBG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-84.14%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-78.97%	+22.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.12%	-76.95%	+48.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.83%	-44.86%	-1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.06%	46.32%	-17.26%

Volatility

AMDL vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 43.99% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) at 23.90%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	ADBG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.99%	23.90%	+20.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	106.86%	61.43%	+45.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	137.54%	71.84%	+65.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.34%	69.74%	+49.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.34%	69.74%	+49.60%

AMDL vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDL vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDL and ADBG in my portfolio?

AMDL and ADBG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDL or ADBG?

AMDL has higher volatility (43.99%) compared to ADBG (23.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDL dropped -88.63% vs ADBG's -84.14%.

Which ETF is better, AMDL or ADBG?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 455.89% vs -67.64% for ADBG. On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ADBG has been the lower-risk option at 23.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDL or ADBG?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 455.89% return vs -67.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDL or ADBG?

ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDL or ADBG?

AMDL and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AMDL and ADBG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMDL and 0.75% for ADBG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.