AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L
AMDI.L (IncomeShares AMD Options ETP) and MSFY.L (IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDI.L returned 141.43% vs -28.86% for MSFY.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDI.L achieves a 116.03% return, which is significantly higher than MSFY.L's -27.67% return.
AMDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 109.68%
- YTD
- 116.03%
- 1Y
- 141.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFY.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- 6M
- -24.15%
- YTD
- -27.67%
- 1Y
- -28.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 116.03% | 12,701.59% |
MSFY.L IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP | -27.67% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDI.L and MSFY.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMDI.L
MSFY.L
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMDI.L | MSFY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.80 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | -0.75 | +3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | -1.40 | +6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, which is greater than MSFY.L's maximum drawdown of -38.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and MSFY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDI.L | MSFY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.34% | -38.40% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.34% | -38.40% | -8.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -33.49% | +32.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.07% | -12.02% | -9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.75% | 20.52% | +7.23% |
Volatility
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a higher volatility of 23.14% compared to IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) at 9.27%. This indicates that AMDI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDI.L | MSFY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.14% | 9.27% | +13.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.81% | 21.35% | +24.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.61% | 24.33% | +50.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,806.47% | 24.39% | +9,782.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,806.47% | 24.39% | +9,782.08% |
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMDI.L and MSFY.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
AMDI.L vs. MSFY.L - Dividend Comparison
AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.56%, more than MSFY.L's 18.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 44.56% | 8.85% | 0.00% |
MSFY.L IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP | 18.83% | 6.74% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDI.L and MSFY.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDI.L and MSFY.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for AMDI.L and MSFY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer