MSFY.L vs. MSFY
MSFY.L (IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP) and MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. MSFY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for MSFY.
Performance
MSFY.L vs. MSFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSFY.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFY
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- -16.33%
- 6M
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY.L vs. MSFY — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY.L
MSFY
MSFY.L vs. MSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFY.L | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.15 | — |
Drawdowns
MSFY.L vs. MSFY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY.L | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -22.70% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.25% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.52% | — |
Volatility
MSFY.L vs. MSFY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY.L | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 26.67% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.31% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.31% | — |
MSFY.L vs. MSFY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFY.L vs. MSFY - Dividend Comparison
MSFY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 24.99% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
MSFY.L IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MSFY.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFY.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MSFY.L and 1.00% for MSFY.
Find the right allocation for MSFY.L and MSFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer