PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSFY.L is traded in USD, while QQQO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQQO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


MSFY.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQO.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility

MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFY.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSFY.L nor QQQO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QQQO.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQO.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MSFY.L.

MSFY.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQO.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MSFY.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFY.L and QQQO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer