AMDG vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. AMDG is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, AMDG returned 1172.87% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. AMDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

AMDG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDG achieves a 391.03% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.

AMDG

• 1D: 7.70%
• 1M: 134.89%
• YTD: 391.03%
• 6M: 367.32%
• 1Y: 1,172.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	391.03%	183.23%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDG and RBIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

AMDG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 97

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.15	5.01	+4.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.75	7.92	-3.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	2.39	-0.76
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	20.99	17.00	+4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.10	70.66	-29.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDG vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDG Sharpe Ratio is 9.15, which is higher than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDG and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDG	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.15	5.01	+4.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.36	4.28	-0.91

Drawdowns

AMDG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDG drawdown since its inception was -63.04%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDG and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDG	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.04%	-0.50%	-62.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.48%	-0.27%	-56.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.70%	-0.06%	-25.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.80%	0.07%	+28.73%

Volatility

AMDG vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a higher volatility of 45.35% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that AMDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDG	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	45.35%	0.30%	+45.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	94.94%	0.79%	+94.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.64%	0.92%	+128.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	130.26%	1.05%	+129.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.26%	1.05%	+129.21%

AMDG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	2.28%	11.21%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDG and RBIL in my portfolio?

AMDG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDG or RBIL?

AMDG has higher volatility (45.35%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDG dropped -63.04% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, AMDG or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 1172.87% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDG or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 1172.87% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDG or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDG or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.28% for AMDG.

What is the main difference between AMDG and RBIL?

AMDG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMDG and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.15 vs 5.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.