AMDG vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDG returned 826.23% vs 22.41% for QTAP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

AMDG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDG achieves a 329.09% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 12.83% return.

AMDG

• 1D: -11.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• YTD: 329.09%
• 6M: 325.72%
• 1Y: 826.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 12.83%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	329.09%	95.49%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	12.83%	16.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDG and QTAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	0.58

The correlation between AMDG and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMDG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDG	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.20	3.70	+2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	6.02	-1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.94	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.77	9.04	+5.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.66	52.85	-24.19

AMDG vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDG Sharpe Ratio is 6.20, which is higher than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDG and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMDG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDG drawdown since its inception was -63.32%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDG and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDG	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.32%	-29.44%	-33.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.48%	-2.49%	-53.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.62%	-1.70%	-10.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.39%	-4.99%	-20.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.06%	0.43%	+28.63%

Volatility

AMDG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a higher volatility of 48.45% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.03%. This indicates that AMDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDG	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.45%	3.03%	+45.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.73%	4.94%	+97.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.55%	6.12%	+128.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	132.44%	18.92%	+113.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	132.44%	18.72%	+113.72%

AMDG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	2.61%	11.21%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDG and QTAP in my portfolio?

AMDG and QTAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDG or QTAP?

AMDG has higher volatility (48.45%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDG dropped -63.32% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, AMDG or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 826.23% vs 22.41% for QTAP. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDG or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 826.23% return vs 22.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDG or QTAP?

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDG or QTAP?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between AMDG and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMDG and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.20 vs 3.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.