PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDD vs. CRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDD vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDD achieves a -67.83% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 3.14% return.


AMDD

1D
-4.47%
1M
-41.37%
YTD
-67.83%
6M
-67.43%
1Y
-85.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRSH

1D
-0.01%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
3.14%
6M
3.01%
1Y
-18.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDD vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMDD and CRSH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDD vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDD
AMDD Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
AMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDD vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMDDCRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.61

0.94

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.55

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

-0.86

-0.75

AMDD vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDD Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDD and CRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMDDCRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.31

-0.50

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.21

-0.71

-0.51

Drawdowns

AMDD vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDD drawdown since its inception was -90.88%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDD and CRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDDCRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.88%

-63.68%

-27.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.34%

-33.45%

-51.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.88%

-59.42%

-31.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-43.11%

-13.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.65%

21.14%

+31.51%

Volatility

AMDD vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) has a higher volatility of 27.50% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 10.19%. This indicates that AMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDDCRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.50%

10.19%

+17.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.96%

22.66%

+26.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.96%

36.72%

+28.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.71%

47.50%

+18.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.71%

47.50%

+18.21%

AMDD vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDD vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

AMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.24%, less than CRSH's 96.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDD
Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares
18.24%5.51%0.00%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
96.17%138.78%94.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDD and CRSH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDD has higher volatility (27.50%) compared to CRSH (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDD dropped -90.88% vs CRSH's -63.68%.

On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -18.24% vs -85.10% for AMDD. On fees, AMDD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -18.24% return vs -85.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMDD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 18.24% for AMDD.

AMDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMDD and 0.99% for CRSH.

CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.50 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDD and CRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer