AMDD vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMDD (Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDD returned -85.10% vs 1189.78% for AMDL. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. AMDD charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

AMDD vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDD achieves a -67.83% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.

AMDD

• 1D: -4.47%
• 1M: -41.37%
• YTD: -67.83%
• 6M: -67.43%
• 1Y: -85.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 8.25%
• 1M: 135.69%
• YTD: 395.18%
• 6M: 371.52%
• 1Y: 1,189.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDD vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDD Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares	-67.83%	-60.76%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	395.18%	146.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDD and AMDL is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	-1.00

The correlation between AMDD and AMDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMDD vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDD

AMDD Risk / Return Rank: 0
AMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
AMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
AMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
AMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
AMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDD vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDD	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.31	9.30	-10.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.04	4.81	-7.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.61	1.63	-1.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	21.43	-22.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.62	42.08	-43.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDD vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDD Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 9.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDD and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDD	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.31	9.30	-10.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.21	0.56	-1.78

Drawdowns

AMDD vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDD drawdown since its inception was -90.88%, roughly equal to the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDD and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDD	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.88%	-88.63%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.34%	-56.13%	-29.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.88%	0.00%	-90.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.26%	-48.58%	-7.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.65%	28.53%	+24.12%

Volatility

AMDD vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares (AMDD) is 27.50%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that AMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDD	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.50%	46.02%	-18.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.96%	94.09%	-45.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.96%	129.41%	-64.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.71%	116.59%	-50.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.71%	116.59%	-50.88%

AMDD vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDD vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

AMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.24%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDD Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares	18.24%	5.51%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDD and AMDL in my portfolio?

AMDD and AMDL have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDD or AMDL?

AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to AMDD (27.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDD dropped -90.88% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

Which ETF is better, AMDD or AMDL?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1189.78% vs -85.10% for AMDD. On fees, AMDD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, AMDD has been the lower-risk option at 27.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDD or AMDL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1189.78% return vs -85.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDD or AMDL?

AMDD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDD or AMDL?

AMDD has the higher dividend yield at 18.24%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between AMDD and AMDL?

AMDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMDD and 1.15% for AMDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.