AMCR vs. ES
AMCR (Amcor plc) and ES (Eversource Energy) are both stocks. AMCR operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while ES operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, AMCR returned -3.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ES. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMCR vs. ES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMCR achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than ES's 4.32% return.
AMCR
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- -5.24%
- 3Y*
- -2.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
ES
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
AMCR vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMCR Amcor plc | 0.28% | -6.17% | 2.61% | -14.97% | 3.20% | 6.16% | 13.41% | -0.09% |
ES Eversource Energy | 4.32% | 22.86% | -2.46% | -23.43% | -5.06% | 8.18% | 4.45% | 13.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMCR and ES is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019 | 0.36 |
The correlation between AMCR and ES shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMCR:
$18.83B
ES:
$25.87B
AMCR:
$1.59
ES:
$4.68
AMCR:
25.59
ES:
14.67
AMCR:
0.78
ES:
1.84
AMCR:
0.50
ES:
0.00
AMCR:
$22.19B
ES:
$13.93B
AMCR:
$4.10B
ES:
$4.19B
AMCR:
$2.58B
ES:
$4.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMCR vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank
AMCR
ES
AMCR vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amcor plc (AMCR) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMCR | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.09 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.61 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 1.46 | -1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMCR vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMCR drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, smaller than the maximum ES drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMCR and ES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMCR | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.21% | -73.04% | +25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -15.13% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.92% | -28.65% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.24% | -41.69% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.02% | -13.32% | -12.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.56% | -19.06% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.88% | 6.30% | +8.58% |
Volatility
AMCR vs. ES - Volatility Comparison
Amcor plc (AMCR) has a higher volatility of 10.56% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 7.72%. This indicates that AMCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMCR | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 7.72% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.86% | 16.00% | +9.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.71% | 24.68% | +7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 23.94% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 24.35% | +4.91% |
Dividends
AMCR vs. ES - Dividend Comparison
AMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than ES's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMCR Amcor plc | 6.37% | 6.15% | 5.34% | 5.11% | 4.05% | 3.93% | 3.93% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ES Eversource Energy | 4.48% | 4.47% | 4.98% | 4.37% | 3.04% | 2.65% | 2.62% | 2.52% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 3.27% |
Financials
AMCR vs. ES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amcor plc and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AMCR and ES have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMCR has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to ES (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMCR dropped -47.21% vs ES's -73.04%.
ES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMCR and ES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer