AMCGX vs. WWNPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMCGX (Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AMCGX returned 7.68%/yr vs 18.80%/yr for WWNPX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMCGX charges 1.93%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.

Performance

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMCGX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 25.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AMCGX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 7.68%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.80% annualized return.

AMCGX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 4.46%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: -4.27%
• 10Y*: 7.68%

WWNPX

• 1D: 5.58%
• 1M: -5.90%
• YTD: 25.12%
• 6M: 18.16%
• 1Y: 3.83%
• 3Y*: 32.55%
• 5Y*: 15.20%
• 10Y*: 18.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMCGX Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund	4.46%	16.63%	20.10%	22.85%	-35.19%	-29.98%	63.90%	29.63%	-8.03%	27.39%
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	25.12%	-14.61%	88.34%	-16.97%	29.18%	38.14%	3.38%	30.47%	-5.24%	28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AMCGX and WWNPX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between AMCGX and WWNPX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AMCGX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMCGX

AMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 13
AMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
AMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
AMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
AMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
AMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

WWNPX

WWNPX Risk / Return Rank: 3
WWNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
WWNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
WWNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
WWNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
WWNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMCGX	WWNPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	0.07	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	0.33	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.04	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	0.10	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.63	0.20	+3.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the WWNPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMCGX and WWNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMCGX	WWNPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	0.07	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.46	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.66	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.52	-0.48

Drawdowns

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMCGX drawdown since its inception was -74.93%, which is greater than WWNPX's maximum drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMCGX and WWNPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMCGX	WWNPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.93%	-67.87%	-7.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.20%	-23.22%	+7.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.65%	-41.13%	+14.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.50%	-41.13%	-23.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.50%	-43.51%	-20.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.53%	-24.16%	-9.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.87%	-13.90%	-8.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	11.58%	-6.54%

Volatility

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) is 5.52%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.33%. This indicates that AMCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMCGX	WWNPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	9.33%	-3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.68%	27.22%	-12.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.02%	33.21%	-14.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.48%	32.93%	-2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.81%	28.63%	-1.82%

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMCGX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMCGX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison

AMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WWNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMCGX Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.34%	13.72%	10.98%	7.59%
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund	6.56%	8.21%	2.95%	5.65%	2.00%	1.67%	2.15%	1.00%	10.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMCGX and WWNPX in my portfolio?

AMCGX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMCGX or WWNPX?

WWNPX has higher volatility (9.33%) compared to AMCGX (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMCGX dropped -74.93% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.