PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAX vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAX vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -27.96% return.


AMAX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.73%
6M
-1.82%
YTD
0.54%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
5.26%
1M
44.38%
6M
-15.07%
YTD
-27.96%
1Y
240.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAX vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
0.54%11.38%-1.02%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-27.96%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and SMST is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.46

The correlation between AMAX and SMST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.54 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAX vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMAXSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.30

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

2.83

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

5.47

-3.96

AMAX vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAXSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-99.25%

+82.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-85.39%

+77.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-97.17%

+91.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-90.89%

+85.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

44.09%

-41.05%

Volatility

AMAX vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 3.67%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.59%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMAXSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

56.59%

-52.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

135.88%

-127.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

149.23%

-138.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.45%

167.74%

-157.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

167.74%

-157.29%

AMAX vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMAX and SMST have an expense ratio of 1.29%.


Dividends

AMAX vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.67%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
11.67%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAX and SMST have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (56.59%) compared to AMAX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAX dropped -16.28% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 240.03% vs 4.58% for AMAX. Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. On volatility, AMAX has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 240.03% return vs 4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMAX and SMST have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.

AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 11.67%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

AMAX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Defiance.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAX and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer