PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAX vs. AGZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAX vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly higher than AGZD's 2.22% return.


AMAX

1D
-1.01%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
3.91%
6M
2.71%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
10Y*

AGZD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.67%
YTD
2.22%
6M
2.64%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
6.02%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAX vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
3.91%11.38%9.62%6.70%-12.56%-0.20%
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
2.22%4.35%6.64%7.15%1.17%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and AGZD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAX vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AGZD
AGZD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AGZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAXAGZDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.83

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

2.71

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

6.09

-4.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.44

19.08

-14.64

AMAX vs. AGZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the AGZD Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and AGZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAXAGZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.83

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.64

-0.28

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and AGZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAXAGZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-8.46%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-0.87%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.27%

-1.71%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-0.39%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-0.77%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.28%

+2.26%

Volatility

AMAX vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison

RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 1.03%. This indicates that AMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMAXAGZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

1.03%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

1.99%

+6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

2.89%

+7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

3.59%

+6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.37%

3.72%

+6.65%

AMAX vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMAX vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, more than AGZD's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
3.99%4.12%3.96%6.07%8.61%1.66%2.28%2.83%2.62%2.31%1.81%1.66%
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
11.05%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAX and AGZD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to AGZD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAX dropped -16.28% vs AGZD's -8.46%.

On 3-year performance, AMAX leads with 8.85% vs 6.02% for AGZD. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMAX has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMAX.

AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 11.05%, compared with 3.99% for AGZD.

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMAX and 0.23% for AGZD.

AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAX and AGZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer