AMAX vs. AGOX
AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) and AGOX (Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMAX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Adaptive, while AGOX is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Adaptive. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMAX returned 7.50%/yr vs 14.16%/yr for AGOX. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AMAX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for AGOX.
Performance
AMAX vs. AGOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than AGOX's 16.81% return.
AMAX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.90%
AGOX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.70M | $2.48M | $2.81M | |
| $319.31K | $260.04K | $341.45K |
AMAX vs. AGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 0.60% | 11.38% | 9.62% | 6.70% | -12.56% | -0.20% |
AGOX Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF | 16.81% | 8.58% | 15.97% | 19.07% | -19.21% | -2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAX and AGOX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AMAX and AGOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMAX vs. AGOX — Risk / Return Rank
AMAX
AGOX
AMAX vs. AGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMAX | AGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.02 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 3.43 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMAX vs. AGOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum AGOX drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and AGOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAX | AGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -26.93% | +10.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -15.32% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.27% | -21.15% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -5.98% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -8.04% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 4.52% | -1.18% |
Volatility
AMAX vs. AGOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 2.40%, while Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMAX | AGOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 5.32% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.85% | 16.77% | -7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 19.22% | -8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 19.81% | -9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 19.64% | -9.21% |
AMAX vs. AGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AGOX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMAX vs. AGOX - Dividend Comparison
AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, more than AGOX's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGOX Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF | 2.76% | 3.23% | 3.94% | 0.27% | 0.20% | 6.36% |
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF | 11.89% | 9.18% | 7.36% | 6.99% | 11.22% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAX and AGOX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGOX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to AMAX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAX dropped -16.28% vs AGOX's -26.93%.
On 3-year performance, AGOX leads with 14.16% vs 7.50% for AMAX. On fees, AMAX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, AMAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AGOX has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMAX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for AGOX.
AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 2.76% for AGOX.
AMAX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while AGOX is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMAX and 1.33% for AGOX.
AGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMAX and AGOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer