PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAT vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAT vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 95.71% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed STIP with an annualized return of 36.92%, while STIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.


AMAT

1D
0.19%
1M
22.27%
YTD
95.71%
6M
86.67%
1Y
212.10%
3Y*
56.66%
5Y*
30.20%
10Y*
36.92%

STIP

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.01%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAT vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
95.71%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.01%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%5.18%4.89%0.54%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAT and STIP is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2010

0.01

The correlation between AMAT and STIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAT vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAT vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMATSTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.67

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.99

6.56

+3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.56

26.11

+2.46

AMAT vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.64, which is higher than the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAT and STIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMATSTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64

3.13

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

1.23

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

1.30

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.07

-0.64

Drawdowns

AMAT vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and STIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMATSTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.22%

-5.50%

-79.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.37%

-0.69%

-20.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.88%

-0.95%

-48.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.14%

-5.50%

-49.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.14%

-5.50%

-49.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.81%

-0.99%

-37.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

0.18%

+7.28%

Volatility

AMAT vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a higher volatility of 14.64% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.38%. This indicates that AMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMATSTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.64%

0.38%

+14.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.09%

0.99%

+34.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.04%

1.46%

+44.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.56%

2.75%

+40.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.60%

2.45%

+40.15%

Dividends

AMAT vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than STIP's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.38%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAT and STIP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAT has higher volatility (14.64%) compared to STIP (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAT dropped -85.22% vs STIP's -5.50%.

AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAT and STIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer