AMAPX vs. DLENX
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX).
AMAPX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Sep 27, 2015. DLENX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010.
Performance
AMAPX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMAPX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund | -1.66% | 5.98% | 3.77% | 2.09% | -5.27% | 0.49% | 5.35% | 6.61% | 0.08% | 2.56% |
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | -1.03% | 8.11% | 7.92% | 9.36% | -15.50% | 1.71% | 4.66% | 11.71% | -3.54% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAPX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly lower than DLENX's -1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAPX has underperformed DLENX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while DLENX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.78% annualized return.
AMAPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
DLENX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMAPX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMAPX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank
AMAPX
DLENX
AMAPX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAPX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.65 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.07 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.53 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 6.64 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAPX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.65 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.36 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.81 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.92 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAPX and DLENX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AMAPX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison
AMAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than DLENX's 4.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund | 3.41% | 3.52% | 3.15% | 2.25% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 2.62% | 2.14% | 2.14% | 0.00% |
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | 4.88% | 5.33% | 5.71% | 5.29% | 4.49% | 3.74% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 4.29% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
AMAPX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAPX drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, smaller than the maximum DLENX drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAPX and DLENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAPX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -25.64% | +17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -2.77% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.75% | -25.64% | +17.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.75% | -25.64% | +17.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -1.83% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -3.65% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.64% | -0.08% |
Volatility
AMAPX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison
Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) at 0.64%. This indicates that AMAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMAPX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 0.64% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.16% | 1.36% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08% | 2.59% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 4.56% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 4.66% | -2.71% |