AMAGX vs. NVLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX).
AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994. NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009.
Performance
AMAGX vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMAGX vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -11.60% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAGX achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's -11.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMAGX having a 15.74% annualized return and NVLIX not far behind at 15.48%.
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
NVLIX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMAGX vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMAGX vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank
AMAGX
NVLIX
AMAGX vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAGX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.47 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 0.84 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.12 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.39 | +1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 1.29 | +7.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAGX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.47 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.43 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.71 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.74 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAGX and NVLIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMAGX vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison
AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.40%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 25.40% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
Drawdowns
AMAGX vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAGX drawdown since its inception was -57.64%, which is greater than NVLIX's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAGX and NVLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAGX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.64% | -39.57% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -19.01% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -39.57% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.09% | -39.57% | +11.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -16.03% | +8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -6.20% | -4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 5.80% | -2.96% |
Volatility
AMAGX vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) have volatilities of 7.18% and 6.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMAGX | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.85% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 12.64% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 22.89% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 22.40% | -4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 21.99% | -3.68% |