AMAGX vs. SPUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS).
AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994. SPUS is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019.
Performance
AMAGX vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMAGX vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 1.12% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | -4.61% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAGX achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly higher than SPUS's -4.61% return.
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
SPUS
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMAGX vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMAGX vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
AMAGX
SPUS
AMAGX vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAGX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.85 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.02 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 8.55 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAGX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.73 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.76 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAGX and SPUS is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMAGX vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMAGX vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAGX drawdown since its inception was -57.64%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAGX and SPUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAGX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.64% | -30.80% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -12.76% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -28.06% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -6.85% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -6.35% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.01% | -0.17% |
Volatility
AMAGX vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 6.10%. This indicates that AMAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMAGX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.10% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 11.27% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 20.91% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 19.19% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 21.43% | -3.12% |