PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMA vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMA vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF (AMA) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMA

1D
8.42%
1M
136.44%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
11.40%
1M
35.79%
YTD
836.36%
6M
816.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMA vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMA and LINT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMA vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF (AMA) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMA vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMA vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMA drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMA and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMALINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-49.54%

+30.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.43%

+3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-20.20%

+16.52%

Volatility

AMA vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMALINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

181.63%

166.85%

+14.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

181.63%

166.85%

+14.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

181.63%

166.85%

+14.78%

AMA vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMA has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMA vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMA and LINT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMA.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for AMA.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMA and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMA and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer