AMA vs. INTW
AMA (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMA charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
AMA vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMA
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -33.68%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- 4.29%
- 1M
- -50.77%
- 6M
- 175.36%
- YTD
- 332.54%
- 1Y
- 799.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 288.63%
AMA vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AMA Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF | 21.09% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | -42.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMA and INTW is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMA vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
AMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
AMA vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF (AMA) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMA | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 14.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 33.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMA vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMA drawdown since its inception was -49.64%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMA and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMA | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.64% | -60.58% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -57.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.64% | -55.48% | +5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -29.88% | +14.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.75% | — |
Volatility
AMA vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMA | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 123.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 180.21% | 154.48% | +25.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 180.21% | 149.23% | +30.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 180.21% | 149.23% | +30.98% |
AMA vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMA has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMA vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMA nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMA and INTW have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMA is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMA is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
AMA and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMA and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for AMA and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer