AMA vs. COIG
AMA (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. AMA charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.
Performance
AMA vs. COIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMA
- 1D
- -6.84%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG
- 1D
- -6.34%
- 1M
- -12.24%
- 6M
- -68.41%
- YTD
- -65.31%
- 1Y
- -91.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMA vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AMA Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF | 37.78% |
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -29.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMA and COIG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMA vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank
AMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COIG
AMA vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF (AMA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMA | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMA vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMA drawdown since its inception was -42.98%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -93.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMA and COIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMA | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.98% | -93.79% | +50.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -93.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.70% | -92.20% | +49.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.49% | -55.05% | +41.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 72.88% | — |
Volatility
AMA vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMA | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 103.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 182.25% | 133.93% | +48.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 182.25% | 144.16% | +38.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.25% | 144.16% | +38.09% |
AMA vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMA has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMA vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMA nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMA and COIG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AMA.
AMA and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMA and 0.75% for COIG.
Find the right allocation for AMA and COIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer