AMA vs. MSTX
AMA (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF) and MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Defiance. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.29% expense ratio.
Performance
AMA vs. MSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMA
- 1D
- 8.42%
- 1M
- 136.44%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTX
- 1D
- -12.26%
- 1M
- -73.56%
- YTD
- -80.68%
- 6M
- -81.54%
- 1Y
- -98.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMA vs. MSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AMA Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF | 140.44% |
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | -74.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMA and MSTX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMA vs. MSTX — Risk / Return Rank
AMA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTX
AMA vs. MSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF (AMA) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMA | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.73 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMA vs. MSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMA drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum MSTX drawdown of -99.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMA and MSTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMA | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -99.46% | +80.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -98.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -99.41% | +99.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -70.91% | +67.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 79.61% | — |
Volatility
AMA vs. MSTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMA | MSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 120.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 181.63% | 148.43% | +33.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 181.63% | 168.66% | +12.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 181.63% | 168.66% | +12.97% |
AMA vs. MSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMA and MSTX have an expense ratio of 1.29%.
Dividends
AMA vs. MSTX - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMA nor MSTX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMA Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AMAT ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMA and MSTX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMA and MSTX have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.
AMA and MSTX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for AMA and MSTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer