ALUM.L vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ALUM.L (WisdomTree Aluminium) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ALUM.L is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Aluminum, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ALUM.L returned 6.81%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SLV. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ALUM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.

Performance

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALUM.L achieves a 25.85% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ALUM.L has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 6.81%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.

ALUM.L

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 25.85%
• 6M: 29.08%
• 1Y: 52.01%
• 3Y*: 17.40%
• 5Y*: 7.40%
• 10Y*: 6.81%

SLV

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 29.40%
• 1Y: 113.72%
• 3Y*: 45.73%
• 5Y*: 21.04%
• 10Y*: 15.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALUM.L WisdomTree Aluminium	25.85%	17.98%	4.62%	-4.48%	-15.92%	38.11%	1.95%	-3.12%	-18.30%	29.16%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	3.97%	144.66%	20.89%	-1.09%	2.37%	-12.45%	47.30%	14.88%	-9.19%	5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ALUM.L and SLV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2006	0.24

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALUM.L	SLV
Basic Materials	100.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ALUM.L vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALUM.L

ALUM.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ALUM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ALUM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ALUM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ALUM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 51
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALUM.L	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.94	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	2.10	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.36	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.84	2.69	+3.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.87	5.76	+15.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALUM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALUM.L and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALUM.L	SLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.94	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.58	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.49	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.25	-0.36

Drawdowns

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALUM.L drawdown since its inception was -77.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALUM.L and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALUM.L	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.63%	-76.28%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-42.45%	+33.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.63%	-42.45%	+21.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.34%	-42.45%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.34%	-42.81%	-4.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.28%	-36.57%	-12.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.59%	-44.67%	-13.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	19.81%	-17.33%

Volatility

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Aluminium (ALUM.L) is 6.12%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that ALUM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALUM.L	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.12%	16.34%	-10.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.69%	58.31%	-42.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	58.90%	-40.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.79%	36.15%	-13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	31.83%	-11.82%

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALUM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALUM.L vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALUM.L nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALUM.L and SLV in my portfolio?

ALUM.L and SLV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALUM.L or SLV?

On fees, ALUM.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALUM.L or SLV?

ALUM.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

What is the main difference between ALUM.L and SLV?

ALUM.L is categorized as Metals, while SLV is Silver. ALUM.L tracks Bloomberg Aluminum, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ALUM.L and 0.50% for SLV.