PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTY vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTY achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ALTY has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 6.16%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return.


ALTY

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.31%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.51%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
6.16%

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
6.19%11.07%10.88%10.58%-11.92%23.08%-12.82%21.44%-6.18%10.82%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTY and QYLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.46

The correlation between ALTY and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ALTY vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALTY
QYLD

Real Estate

33.2%
0.1%

Energy

21.0%
0.6%

Technology

18.3%
53.8%

Utilities

12.7%
1.4%

Communication Services

5.3%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
7.7%

Healthcare

1.4%
4.2%

Industrials

1.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

ALTY
33.2%
QYLD
0.1%

Energy

ALTY
21.0%
QYLD
0.6%

Technology

ALTY
18.3%
QYLD
53.8%

Utilities

ALTY
12.7%
QYLD
1.4%

Communication Services

ALTY
5.3%
QYLD
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ALTY
4.1%
QYLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

ALTY
2.6%
QYLD
7.7%

Healthcare

ALTY
1.4%
QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

ALTY
1.0%
QYLD
2.8%

Basic Materials

ALTY
0.4%
QYLD
1.1%

Financial Services

ALTY
0.1%
QYLD
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTY
ALTY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTYQYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

2.80

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.82

3.92

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.63

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

4.84

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.84

28.36

-11.53

ALTY vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTY and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTYQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.80

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.63

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.59

-0.26

Drawdowns

ALTY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTY drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTY and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTYQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-24.75%

-26.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-4.97%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-19.06%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

-24.61%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.47%

-24.75%

-26.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.06%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-3.84%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.85%

+0.09%

Volatility

ALTY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) is 1.41%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that ALTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTYQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.85%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

7.12%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.79%

8.58%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

14.70%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

15.49%

+1.09%

ALTY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ALTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTY
Global X Alternative Income ETF
8.08%7.50%7.88%7.31%7.66%6.88%9.20%8.74%8.49%7.52%8.20%4.21%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to ALTY (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTY dropped -51.47% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 10-year performance, QYLD leads with 9.80% vs 6.16% for ALTY. On fees, ALTY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ALTY has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 9.80% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ALTY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 8.08% for ALTY.

ALTY is categorized as Global Allocation, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. ALTY tracks Indxx SuperDividend Alternatives Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ALTY and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTY and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer