ALTY vs. GDMA
ALTY (Global X Alternative Income ETF) and GDMA (Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. ALTY is passively managed, while GDMA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ALTY returned 5.56%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for GDMA. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ALTY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GDMA.
Performance
ALTY vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALTY achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 10.56% return.
ALTY
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 14.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.19%
GDMA
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 25.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $136.24K | $196.63K | $163.35K | |
| $1.65M | $1.00M | $708.66K |
ALTY vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTY Global X Alternative Income ETF | 7.43% | 11.07% | 10.88% | 10.58% | -11.92% | 23.08% | -12.82% | 21.44% | -7.16% |
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 10.56% | 25.29% | 7.44% | 1.72% | -2.08% | 3.95% | 21.08% | 11.59% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALTY and GDMA is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between ALTY and GDMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (5 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALTY vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank
ALTY
GDMA
ALTY vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALTY | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.28 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.12 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.62 | 7.24 | +7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALTY vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALTY drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than GDMA's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTY and GDMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALTY | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -16.66% | -34.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -7.53% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.08% | -7.53% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.48% | -12.74% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -3.21% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -3.79% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 3.24% | -2.29% |
Volatility
ALTY vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY) is 1.47%, while Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that ALTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALTY | GDMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 3.27% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.61% | 13.20% | -8.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.93% | 15.80% | -9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.47% | 10.24% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 11.39% | +5.10% |
ALTY vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALTY vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison
ALTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than GDMA's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTY Global X Alternative Income ETF | 7.48% | 7.50% | 7.88% | 7.31% | 7.66% | 6.88% | 9.20% | 8.74% | 8.49% | 7.52% | 8.20% | 4.21% |
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 2.53% | 2.79% | 2.32% | 4.14% | 1.18% | 2.10% | 0.62% | 3.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALTY and GDMA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMA has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to ALTY (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTY dropped -51.47% vs GDMA's -16.66%.
On 5-year performance, GDMA leads with 8.45% vs 5.56% for ALTY. On fees, ALTY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ALTY has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDMA has performed better with a 8.45% return vs 5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ALTY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GDMA.
ALTY has the higher dividend yield at 7.48%, compared with 2.53% for GDMA.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Gadsden. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ALTY and 0.77% for GDMA.
ALTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALTY and GDMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer