ALTL vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALTL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ALTL returned 13.86%/yr vs 54.15%/yr for TRFK. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

ALTL vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 69.94% return.

ALTL

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 12.43%
• YTD: 16.90%
• 6M: 16.56%
• 1Y: 44.84%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: —

TRFK

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 31.98%
• YTD: 69.94%
• 6M: 62.01%
• 1Y: 103.92%
• 3Y*: 54.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTL vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	16.90%	16.61%	12.30%	-15.85%	-1.36%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	69.94%	26.81%	38.30%	66.63%	-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTL and TRFK is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022	0.55

The correlation between ALTL and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

ALTL vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALTL	TRFK
Utilities	26.8%	-
Financial Services	16.6%	-
Real Estate	14.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.8%	-
Industrials	10.2%	8.3%
Healthcare	6.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	-
Technology	4.6%	91.8%
Basic Materials	2.0%	-
Energy	0.9%	-
Communication Services	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

ALTL vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTL

ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 78
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 86
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 87
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTL vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALTL	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	3.78	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	4.39	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.55	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	5.34	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.35	12.82	+3.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALTL vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is lower than the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTL and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALTL	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	3.78	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	1.58	-0.86

Drawdowns

ALTL vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALTL	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.91%	-29.06%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-19.56%	+9.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.21%	-29.06%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.06%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.58%	-6.04%	-5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	8.13%	-5.38%

Volatility

ALTL vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) is 7.26%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that ALTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALTL	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	9.93%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.97%	21.73%	-10.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	27.70%	-9.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.38%	28.91%	-10.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.09%	28.91%	-8.82%

ALTL vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ALTL and TRFK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

ALTL vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	0.94%	0.95%	1.56%	1.28%	1.23%	1.06%	0.75%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALTL and TRFK in my portfolio?

ALTL and TRFK have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALTL or TRFK?

TRFK has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to ALTL (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTL dropped -31.91% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

Which ETF is better, ALTL or TRFK?

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 54.15% vs 13.86% for ALTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, ALTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALTL or TRFK?

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 54.15% return vs 13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALTL or TRFK?

ALTL and TRFK have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALTL or TRFK?

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

What is the main difference between ALTL and TRFK?

ALTL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities. ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.