ALTL vs. QWLD

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) and QWLD (State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALTL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while QWLD is a Multi-factor fund tracking the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ALTL returned 3.16%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for QWLD. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ALTL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

ALTL vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 11.46% return.

ALTL

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -4.43%
• 6M: 6.13%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: 9.15%
• 5Y*: 3.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.24%

QWLD

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 3.08%
• 6M: 7.37%
• YTD: 11.46%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 16.93%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 11.78%
• ALL TIME*: 10.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	$430.41K	$501.47K	$360.46K
QWLD State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	$292.86K	$296.31K	$1.06M

ALTL vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	10.41%	16.61%	12.30%	-15.85%	-10.67%	45.30%	35.38%
QWLD State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	11.46%	17.93%	14.44%	19.59%	-13.30%	21.57%	19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTL and QWLD is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020	0.70

The correlation between ALTL and QWLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ALTL vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALTL	QWLD
Technology	46.6%	24.9%
Industrials	15.8%	10.9%
Real Estate	14.8%	1.0%
Financial Services	12.4%	16.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	6.3%
Healthcare	5.6%	13.2%
Utilities	2.3%	3.8%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.5%
Communication Services	2.1%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	8.1%
Energy	0.7%	3.4%

Return for Risk

ALTL vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ALTL

ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 37
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QWLD

QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 78
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ALTL vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALTL	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.10	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	2.98	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.38	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	2.66	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.56	11.63	-6.07

ALTL vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTL and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALTL vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, roughly equal to the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and QWLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALTL	QWLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.91%	-31.89%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	-7.66%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.08%	-12.40%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.91%	-22.84%	-9.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.41%	-0.10%	-8.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-3.66%	-7.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	1.75%	+2.17%

Volatility

ALTL vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.60%. This indicates that ALTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALTL	QWLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.77%	2.60%	+6.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.68%	7.76%	+9.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.59%	9.70%	+12.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.52%	13.52%	+6.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.74%	15.13%	+5.61%

ALTL vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALTL vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than QWLD's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	0.93%	0.95%	1.56%	1.28%	1.23%	1.06%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QWLD State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	1.75%	1.85%	1.74%	1.78%	2.02%	1.77%	1.77%	2.13%	2.33%	2.73%	2.22%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALTL and QWLD in my portfolio?

ALTL and QWLD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALTL or QWLD?

ALTL has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to QWLD (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTL dropped -31.91% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

Which ETF is better, ALTL or QWLD?

On 5-year performance, QWLD leads with 10.26% vs 3.16% for ALTL. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALTL or QWLD?

Over the 5-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 10.26% return vs 3.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALTL or QWLD?

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALTL or QWLD?

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.93% for ALTL.

What is the main difference between ALTL and QWLD?

ALTL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QWLD is Multi-factor. ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while QWLD tracks MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ALTL and 0.30% for QWLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.