ALTL vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ALTL is passively managed, while HYP is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALTL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

ALTL vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 36.25% return.

ALTL

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 10.54%
• YTD: 20.56%
• 6M: 20.25%
• 1Y: 46.05%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: —

HYP

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: 6.37%
• YTD: 36.25%
• 6M: 30.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTL vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	20.56%	0.57%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	36.25%	-6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTL and HYP is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

ALTL vs. HYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTL

ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 77
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

HYP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTL vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALTL	HYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.73	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.98	—	—

Drawdowns

ALTL vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, which is greater than HYP's maximum drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALTL	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.91%	-19.58%	-12.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.50%	-6.44%	-5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALTL	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.62%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.16%	42.95%	-22.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.89%	42.95%	-24.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.41%	42.95%	-22.54%

ALTL vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALTL vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than HYP's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	0.85%	0.95%	1.56%	1.28%	1.23%	1.06%	0.75%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.10%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALTL and HYP in my portfolio?

ALTL and HYP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALTL or HYP?

On fees, ALTL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALTL or HYP?

ALTL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALTL or HYP?

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.

What is the main difference between ALTL and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ALTL and 0.85% for HYP.