PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTL vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return.


ALTL

1D
-0.66%
1M
12.43%
YTD
16.90%
6M
16.56%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
16.90%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%21.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTL and DGRO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.75

The correlation between ALTL and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ALTL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALTL
DGRO

Utilities

26.8%
6.9%

Financial Services

16.6%
21.2%

Real Estate

14.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
11.5%

Industrials

10.2%
10.8%

Healthcare

6.8%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
5.7%

Technology

4.6%
19.4%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.5%

Energy

0.9%
5.6%

Communication Services

0.8%
0.1%

Utilities

ALTL
26.8%
DGRO
6.9%

Financial Services

ALTL
16.6%
DGRO
21.2%

Real Estate

ALTL
14.8%
DGRO

-

Consumer Defensive

ALTL
10.8%
DGRO
11.5%

Industrials

ALTL
10.2%
DGRO
10.8%

Healthcare

ALTL
6.8%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ALTL
5.7%
DGRO
5.7%

Technology

ALTL
4.6%
DGRO
19.4%

Basic Materials

ALTL
2.0%
DGRO
2.5%

Energy

ALTL
0.9%
DGRO
5.6%

Communication Services

ALTL
0.8%
DGRO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTLDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

3.50

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.35

13.52

+2.83

ALTL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTLDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.39

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.77

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.76

-0.04

Drawdowns

ALTL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTLDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.91%

-35.10%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-6.47%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.21%

-14.03%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

-19.31%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.28%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.58%

-3.44%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.67%

+1.08%

Volatility

ALTL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that ALTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTLDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

2.21%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

6.91%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

9.48%

+8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.38%

13.82%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

16.62%

+3.47%

ALTL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
0.94%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTL has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTL dropped -31.91% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs 5.04% for ALTL. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.94% for ALTL.

ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ALTL and 0.08% for DGRO.

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTL and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer