ALTL vs. DGRO
ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ALTL tracks the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ALTL returned 5.04%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for DGRO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALTL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
ALTL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return.
ALTL
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 12.43%
- YTD
- 16.90%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
ALTL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 16.90% | 16.61% | 12.30% | -15.85% | -10.67% | 45.30% | 33.74% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 21.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALTL and DGRO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ALTL and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ALTL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ALTL
DGRO
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
ALTL
DGRO
Financial Services
ALTL
DGRO
Real Estate
ALTL
DGRO
-
Consumer Defensive
ALTL
DGRO
Industrials
ALTL
DGRO
Healthcare
ALTL
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
ALTL
DGRO
Technology
ALTL
DGRO
Basic Materials
ALTL
DGRO
Energy
ALTL
DGRO
Communication Services
ALTL
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALTL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ALTL
DGRO
ALTL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALTL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 3.50 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.35 | 13.52 | +2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALTL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.39 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.77 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.76 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ALTL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALTL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.91% | -35.10% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -6.47% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.21% | -14.03% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.91% | -19.31% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.28% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.58% | -3.44% | -8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 1.67% | +1.08% |
Volatility
ALTL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that ALTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALTL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 2.21% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 6.91% | +4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.05% | 9.48% | +8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 13.82% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 16.62% | +3.47% |
ALTL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALTL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 0.94% | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALTL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALTL has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTL dropped -31.91% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs 5.04% for ALTL. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.94% for ALTL.
ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ALTL and 0.08% for DGRO.
ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALTL and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer