PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTL vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTL vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 23.10% return.


ALTL

1D
-2.54%
1M
-5.96%
6M
6.34%
YTD
9.78%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*

BIBL

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.16%
6M
15.29%
YTD
23.10%
1Y
34.28%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTL vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
9.78%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%35.38%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
23.10%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%24.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTL and BIBL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.73

The correlation between ALTL and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

ALTL vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALTL
BIBL

Technology

47.2%
30.8%

Real Estate

14.8%
11.3%

Industrials

13.2%
26.7%

Financial Services

13.1%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
0.4%

Healthcare

5.6%
4.2%

Utilities

3.2%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
0.2%

Energy

0.7%
7.9%

Technology

ALTL
47.2%
BIBL
30.8%

Real Estate

ALTL
14.8%
BIBL
11.3%

Industrials

ALTL
13.2%
BIBL
26.7%

Financial Services

ALTL
13.1%
BIBL
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ALTL
11.6%
BIBL
0.4%

Healthcare

ALTL
5.6%
BIBL
4.2%

Utilities

ALTL
3.2%
BIBL
3.3%

Basic Materials

ALTL
3.0%
BIBL
5.3%

Communication Services

ALTL
1.5%
BIBL

-

Consumer Defensive

ALTL
0.8%
BIBL
0.2%

Energy

ALTL
0.7%
BIBL
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTL vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTL vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALTLBIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.85

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

15.48

-8.53

ALTL vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTL and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALTL vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and BIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTLBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.91%

-36.12%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-8.94%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.21%

-20.60%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

-30.85%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.94%

-4.60%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-6.97%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.22%

+0.97%

Volatility

ALTL vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 6.55%. This indicates that ALTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTLBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

6.55%

+3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.89%

14.26%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.73%

17.09%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

19.87%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

21.11%

-0.48%

ALTL vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTL vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, which matches BIBL's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
0.93%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
0.93%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTL and BIBL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTL has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to BIBL (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTL dropped -31.91% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

On 5-year performance, BIBL leads with 9.94% vs 3.25% for ALTL. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BIBL has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

ALTL and BIBL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.93%.

ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ALTL and 0.35% for BIBL.

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTL and BIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer