ALRG vs. VTI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ALRG is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past year, ALRG returned 21.50% vs 22.02% for VTI. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

ALRG vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.37% return.

ALRG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: 7.88%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTI

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 9.07%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 1Y: 22.02%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: 12.17%
• 10Y*: 14.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	9.57%	11.78%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	11.37%	10.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and VTI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.95

The correlation between ALRG and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ALRG vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALRG	VTI
Technology	33.6%	37.0%
Financial Services	13.1%	11.3%
Industrials	11.3%	9.4%
Communication Services	10.1%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	9.7%
Healthcare	6.7%	9.0%
Energy	2.3%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	4.3%
Basic Materials	0.8%	1.9%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

ALRG vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALRG

ALRG Risk / Return Rank: 63
ALRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ALRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ALRG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ALRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ALRG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 67
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALRG vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALRG	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.73	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.38	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.48	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	10.86	-1.27

ALRG vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALRG and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALRG	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-55.45%	+46.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.27%	-8.92%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.57%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-8.00%	+6.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	2.03%	+0.22%

Volatility

ALRG vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) is 3.36%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that ALRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALRG	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	3.75%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	10.12%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	12.82%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	17.51%	-4.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	18.29%	-5.64%

ALRG vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALRG vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VTI's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.43%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.05%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALRG and VTI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ALRG and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ALRG or VTI?

VTI has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to ALRG (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALRG dropped -9.27% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, ALRG or VTI?

On 1-year performance, VTI leads with 22.02% vs 21.50% for ALRG. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ALRG has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALRG or VTI?

Over the 1-year period, VTI has performed better with a 22.02% return vs 21.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALRG or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ALRG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALRG or VTI?

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.43% for ALRG.

What is the main difference between ALRG and VTI?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.