ALRG vs. PSCX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ALRG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Allspring, while PSCX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ALRG returned 21.50% vs 13.03% for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

ALRG vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.77% return.

ALRG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: 7.88%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 4.99%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 1Y: 13.03%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	9.57%	11.78%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.77%	7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and PSCX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.90

The correlation between ALRG and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ALRG vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALRG	PSCX
Technology	33.6%	33.2%
Financial Services	13.1%	12.5%
Industrials	11.3%	8.4%
Communication Services	10.1%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.0%
Healthcare	6.7%	9.6%
Energy	2.3%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	5.4%
Basic Materials	0.8%	1.9%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

ALRG vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALRG

ALRG Risk / Return Rank: 63
ALRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ALRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ALRG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ALRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ALRG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALRG vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALRG	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.33	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	3.46	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.47	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	3.11	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	15.53	-5.94

ALRG vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALRG and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALRG	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-10.20%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.27%	-4.20%	-5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.06%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-1.84%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	0.84%	+1.41%

Volatility

ALRG vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 1.68%. This indicates that ALRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALRG	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	1.68%	+1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	4.60%	+5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	5.61%	+7.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	7.12%	+5.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	6.95%	+5.70%

ALRG vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALRG vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.43%	0.47%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALRG and PSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, ALRG and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ALRG or PSCX?

ALRG has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to PSCX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALRG dropped -9.27% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, ALRG or PSCX?

On 1-year performance, ALRG leads with 21.50% vs 13.03% for PSCX. On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALRG or PSCX?

Over the 1-year period, ALRG has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALRG or PSCX?

ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALRG or PSCX?

ALRG has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between ALRG and PSCX?

ALRG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSCX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.