ALRG vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

ALRG vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.

ALRG

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 9.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	9.39%	11.95%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.11%	7.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and PSCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.91

ALRG vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALRG	PSCX
Technology	39.8%	33.2%
Financial Services	14.2%	12.5%
Communication Services	11.2%	10.3%
Industrials	10.4%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	5.6%	9.6%
Energy	5.3%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	5.4%
Basic Materials	0.8%	1.9%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

ALRG vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALRG vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALRG	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	1.27	+0.74

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALRG	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-10.20%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.12%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-1.87%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALRG	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.52%	5.53%	+6.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.52%	7.07%	+5.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.52%	6.96%	+5.56%

ALRG vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALRG vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.43%	0.47%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALRG and PSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ALRG and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ALRG or PSCX?

On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALRG or PSCX?

ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALRG or PSCX?

ALRG has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between ALRG and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 0.75% for PSCX.