PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALRG vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALRG vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.


ALRG

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.23%
YTD
9.39%
6M
9.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and FNDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.77

ALRG vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALRG
FNDX

Technology

39.8%
19.1%

Financial Services

14.2%
14.1%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.1%

Industrials

10.4%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.2%

Healthcare

5.6%
12.0%

Energy

5.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
7.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Technology

ALRG
39.8%
FNDX
19.1%

Financial Services

ALRG
14.2%
FNDX
14.1%

Communication Services

ALRG
11.2%
FNDX
10.1%

Industrials

ALRG
10.4%
FNDX
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ALRG
10.1%
FNDX
9.2%

Healthcare

ALRG
5.6%
FNDX
12.0%

Energy

ALRG
5.3%
FNDX
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

ALRG
2.5%
FNDX
7.4%

Basic Materials

ALRG
0.8%
FNDX
3.7%

Real Estate

ALRG

-

FNDX
1.8%

Utilities

ALRG

-

FNDX
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALRG vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALRG

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALRG vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ALRG vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALRGFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.01

0.79

+1.22

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALRGFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-37.72%

+28.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.13%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-3.55%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

ALRG vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALRGFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

10.22%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.52%

15.18%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.52%

17.50%

-4.98%

ALRG vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALRG vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALRG
Allspring LT Large Core ETF
0.43%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALRG and FNDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for ALRG.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.43% for ALRG.

ALRG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 0.25% for FNDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALRG and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer