ALRG vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

ALRG vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 46.16% return.

ALRG

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: -6.27%
• 1M: 10.31%
• YTD: 46.16%
• 6M: 43.90%
• 1Y: 72.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	5.94%	11.78%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	46.16%	13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and CNAV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

ALRG vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALRG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 84
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALRG vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALRG	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.51	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.59	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	22.08	—

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALRG	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-30.06%	+20.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-6.27%	+2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-5.38%	+4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALRG	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	28.97%	-16.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.84%	29.02%	-16.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.84%	29.02%	-16.18%

ALRG vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALRG vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.44%	0.47%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALRG and CNAV in my portfolio?

ALRG and CNAV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALRG or CNAV?

On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALRG or CNAV?

ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALRG or CNAV?

ALRG has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between ALRG and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 1.31% for CNAV.