PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALMU vs. APP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALMU vs. APP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and AppLovin Corporation (APP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMU achieves a 46.77% return, which is significantly higher than APP's -26.28% return.


ALMU

1D
1.45%
1M
1.37%
YTD
46.77%
6M
38.84%
1Y
88.27%
3Y*
113.21%
5Y*
10Y*

APP

1D
3.80%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-26.28%
6M
-25.93%
1Y
36.29%
3Y*
180.45%
5Y*
43.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMU vs. APP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc
46.77%124.44%163.79%38.10%5.00%
APP
AppLovin Corporation
-26.28%108.08%712.62%278.44%-32.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMU and APP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALMU:

$437.33M

APP:

$168.27B

EPS

ALMU:

-$0.36

APP:

$11.64

PS Ratio

ALMU:

81.48

APP:

27.44

PB Ratio

ALMU:

10.91

APP:

71.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALMU:

$5.20M

APP:

$6.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALMU:

$2.17M

APP:

$5.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALMU:

-$6.01M

APP:

$4.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALMU vs. APP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMU
ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

APP
APP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
APP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
APP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
APP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
APP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMU vs. APP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) and AppLovin Corporation (APP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALMUAPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.61

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

1.22

+0.40

ALMU vs. APP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the APP Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMU and APP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALMU vs. APP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMU drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum APP drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMU and APP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALMUAPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-91.90%

+36.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.37%

-49.99%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.37%

-57.00%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.97%

-32.28%

+12.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-42.52%

+19.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.25%

25.10%

+4.15%

Volatility

ALMU vs. APP - Volatility Comparison

Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a higher volatility of 44.76% compared to AppLovin Corporation (APP) at 20.54%. This indicates that ALMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALMUAPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.76%

20.54%

+24.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

95.20%

58.87%

+36.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.67%

71.03%

+59.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

123.75%

77.84%

+45.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.75%

77.53%

+46.22%

Dividends

ALMU vs. APP - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALMU nor APP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALMU vs. APP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aeluma, Inc and AppLovin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.22M
1.84B
(ALMU) Total Revenue
(APP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ALMU and APP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALMU has higher volatility (44.76%) compared to APP (20.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMU dropped -55.37% vs APP's -91.90%.

APP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALMU and APP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer