ALMRX vs. ACAZX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ALMRX (Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund) and ACAZX (Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - ALMRX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger, while ACAZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past 10 years, ALMRX returned 12.95%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for ACAZX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALMRX charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ACAZX.

Performance

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMRX achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than ACAZX's 13.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ALMRX has underperformed ACAZX with an annualized return of 12.95%, while ACAZX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.86% annualized return.

ALMRX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 7.02%
• YTD: 8.38%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 3.55%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

ACAZX

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 13.52%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 37.91%
• 3Y*: 41.76%
• 5Y*: 19.63%
• 10Y*: 21.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund	8.38%	17.01%	20.02%	22.68%	-35.28%	6.17%	64.25%	29.79%	-7.77%	28.75%
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	13.52%	31.33%	69.38%	43.53%	-36.63%	18.48%	42.23%	33.63%	-0.61%	31.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMRX and ACAZX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2010	0.63

The correlation between ALMRX and ACAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ALMRX vs. ACAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMRX

ALMRX Risk / Return Rank: 16
ALMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ALMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
ALMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ALMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ALMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

ACAZX

ACAZX Risk / Return Rank: 36
ACAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ACAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ACAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ACAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ACAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALMRX	ACAZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.76	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.33	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.30	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	2.09	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	6.63	-2.46

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the ACAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMRX and ACAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMRX drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, which is greater than ACAZX's maximum drawdown of -47.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMRX and ACAZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMRX	ACAZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.80%	-47.92%	-25.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.06%	-18.97%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.71%	-27.72%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.01%	-47.92%	-16.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.01%	-47.92%	-16.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.01%	-2.29%	-27.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.22%	-8.32%	-13.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.00%	5.96%	-0.96%

Volatility

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) is 6.88%, while Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that ALMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMRX	ACAZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.88%	9.24%	-2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.64%	17.52%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.84%	22.53%	-2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.54%	29.22%	+19.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.84%	25.58%	+12.26%

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALMRX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ACAZX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALMRX vs. ACAZX - Dividend Comparison

ALMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	7.78%	8.83%	23.61%	6.65%	4.13%	22.24%	14.91%	7.87%	11.23%	6.60%	0.82%	8.15%
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	77.91%	12.19%	8.56%	7.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALMRX and ACAZX in my portfolio?

ALMRX and ACAZX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALMRX or ACAZX?

ACAZX has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to ALMRX (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMRX dropped -73.80% vs ACAZX's -47.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.