ACAZX vs. PRWCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ACAZX (Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z) and PRWCX (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - ACAZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger, while PRWCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, ACAZX returned 21.86%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for PRWCX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACAZX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for PRWCX.

Performance

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAZX achieves a 13.52% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ACAZX has outperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 21.86%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.

ACAZX

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 13.52%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 37.91%
• 3Y*: 41.76%
• 5Y*: 19.63%
• 10Y*: 21.86%

PRWCX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 4.53%
• 6M: 4.44%
• 1Y: 12.48%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	13.52%	31.33%	69.38%	43.53%	-36.63%	18.48%	42.23%	33.63%	-0.61%	31.78%
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund	4.53%	12.45%	12.50%	18.85%	-12.00%	18.45%	18.13%	24.62%	0.63%	15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAZX and PRWCX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2010	0.85

The correlation between ACAZX and PRWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ACAZX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAZX

ACAZX Risk / Return Rank: 36
ACAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ACAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ACAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ACAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ACAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

PRWCX

PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 39
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACAZX	PRWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.68	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.37	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	2.07	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	8.70	-2.07

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAZX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAZX drawdown since its inception was -47.92%, which is greater than PRWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAZX and PRWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACAZX	PRWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.92%	-41.77%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.97%	-6.32%	-12.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.72%	-15.96%	-11.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.92%	-17.07%	-30.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.92%	-26.86%	-21.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.29%	-1.58%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.32%	-3.33%	-4.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.96%	1.50%	+4.46%

Volatility

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.80%. This indicates that ACAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACAZX	PRWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.24%	2.80%	+6.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.52%	6.47%	+11.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.53%	7.81%	+14.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.22%	12.79%	+16.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.58%	12.76%	+12.82%

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACAZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACAZX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

ACAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, less than PRWCX's 8.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	7.78%	8.83%	23.61%	6.65%	4.13%	22.24%	14.91%	7.87%	11.23%	6.60%	0.82%	8.15%
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund	8.43%	8.81%	10.38%	4.15%	9.44%	9.23%	7.97%	5.83%	7.46%	6.82%	3.51%	9.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACAZX and PRWCX in my portfolio?

ACAZX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACAZX or PRWCX?

ACAZX has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to PRWCX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAZX dropped -47.92% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.