PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACAZX vs. GQRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAZX achieves a 13.52% return, which is significantly higher than GQRIX's 4.25% return.


ACAZX

1D
-1.77%
1M
2.86%
YTD
13.52%
6M
11.53%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
41.76%
5Y*
19.63%
10Y*
21.86%

GQRIX

1D
0.44%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
4.25%
6M
4.50%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ACAZX
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z
13.52%31.33%69.38%43.53%-36.63%18.48%42.23%16.74%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
4.25%0.91%20.18%19.79%-3.64%17.13%14.75%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAZX and GQRIX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019

0.67

The correlation between ACAZX and GQRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACAZX vs. GQRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAZX
ACAZX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ACAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ACAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRIX
GQRIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GQRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACAZXGQRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.10

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

0.75

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

1.87

+4.76

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the GQRIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAZX and GQRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAZX drawdown since its inception was -47.92%, which is greater than GQRIX's maximum drawdown of -28.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAZX and GQRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACAZXGQRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.92%

-28.86%

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.97%

-7.00%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.72%

-16.47%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.92%

-20.29%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-6.59%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-4.90%

-3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

2.78%

+3.18%

Volatility

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQRIX) at 3.09%. This indicates that ACAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACAZXGQRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

3.09%

+6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

7.22%

+10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.53%

9.32%

+13.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.22%

14.71%

+14.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.58%

17.23%

+8.35%

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACAZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACAZX vs. GQRIX - Dividend Comparison

ACAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than GQRIX's 7.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACAZX
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z
7.78%8.83%23.61%6.65%4.13%22.24%14.91%7.87%11.23%6.60%0.82%8.15%
GQRIX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
7.62%7.94%6.46%1.39%2.99%1.65%0.11%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACAZX and GQRIX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACAZX has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to GQRIX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAZX dropped -47.92% vs GQRIX's -28.86%.

ACAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACAZX and GQRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer