ALMRX vs. ACAAX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

ALMRX (Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund) and ACAAX (Alger Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - ALMRX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger, while ACAAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past 10 years, ALMRX returned 12.56%/yr vs 18.78%/yr for ACAAX. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ALMRX charges 1.44%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for ACAAX.

Performance

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund (ACAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMRX achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than ACAAX's 11.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ALMRX has underperformed ACAAX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while ACAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.78% annualized return.

ALMRX

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -2.13%
• 6M: 8.02%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 2.81%
• 10Y*: 12.56%
• ALL TIME*: 12.54%

ACAAX

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 14.64%
• YTD: 11.02%
• 1Y: 21.87%
• 3Y*: 33.53%
• 5Y*: 14.91%
• 10Y*: 18.78%
• ALL TIME*: 12.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACAAX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund	6.62%	17.01%	20.02%	22.68%	-35.28%	6.17%	64.25%	29.79%	-7.77%	28.75%
ACAAX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund	11.02%	30.80%	49.55%	42.99%	-36.90%	18.17%	41.78%	33.14%	-0.95%	31.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMRX and ACAAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997	0.42

Over the past year, ALMRX and ACAAX have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ALMRX vs. ACAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ALMRX

ALMRX Risk / Return Rank: 14
ALMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
ALMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ALMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ALMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ALMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ACAAX

ACAAX Risk / Return Rank: 27
ACAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ACAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ACAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ACAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
ACAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund (ACAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALMRX	ACAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	1.05	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	1.55	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.19	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	1.30	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	3.91	-1.59

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ACAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMRX and ACAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMRX drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, roughly equal to the maximum ACAAX drawdown of -70.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMRX and ACAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMRX	ACAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.80%	-70.29%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.06%	-19.11%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.71%	-27.79%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.01%	-48.73%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.01%	-48.73%	-15.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.14%	-4.29%	-26.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-22.86%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.19%	6.33%	-1.14%

Volatility

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) is 5.78%, while Alger Capital Appreciation Fund (ACAAX) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that ALMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMRX	ACAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	8.24%	-2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.96%	18.80%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	23.72%	-3.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.56%	29.38%	+19.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.81%	25.65%	+12.16%

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALMRX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ACAAX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALMRX vs. ACAAX - Dividend Comparison

ALMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACAAX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund	8.82%	9.80%	12.93%	7.19%	4.42%	23.67%	15.64%	8.17%	11.59%	6.76%	0.84%	8.28%
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	77.91%	12.19%	8.56%	7.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALMRX and ACAAX in my portfolio?

ALMRX and ACAAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALMRX or ACAAX?

ACAAX has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to ALMRX (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMRX dropped -73.80% vs ACAAX's -70.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.