PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALM vs. CBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALM vs. CBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (ALM) and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ALM having a 49.55% return and CBL slightly higher at 50.81%.


ALM

1D
-5.96%
1M
-29.05%
6M
46.39%
YTD
49.55%
1Y
170.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBL

1D
2.15%
1M
12.63%
6M
50.24%
YTD
50.81%
1Y
117.60%
3Y*
43.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALM vs. CBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ALM
Almonty Industries Inc.
49.55%75.50%
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
50.81%45.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ALM and CBL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALM:

$3.74B

CBL:

$1.68B

EPS

ALM:

-CA$0.50

CBL:

$5.56

PS Ratio

ALM:

98.53

CBL:

2.89

PB Ratio

ALM:

14.42

CBL:

4.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALM:

CA$50.01M

CBL:

$582.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALM:

CA$14.63M

CBL:

$139.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALM:

-CA$125.10M

CBL:

$413.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALM vs. CBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALM
ALM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ALM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ALM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CBL
CBL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALM vs. CBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (ALM) and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALMCBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.64

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

9.55

-5.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

31.17

-22.49

ALM vs. CBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALM Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the CBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALM and CBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALM vs. CBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALM drawdown since its inception was -43.88%, which is greater than CBL's maximum drawdown of -34.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALM and CBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALMCBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.88%

-34.02%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.88%

-12.31%

-31.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.74%

-1.92%

-41.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.18%

-12.23%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.10%

3.77%

+16.33%

Volatility

ALM vs. CBL - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (ALM) has a higher volatility of 25.56% compared to CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) at 10.11%. This indicates that ALM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALMCBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.56%

10.11%

+15.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.56%

21.51%

+49.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.20%

27.71%

+65.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.01%

32.38%

+60.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.01%

32.38%

+60.63%

Dividends

ALM vs. CBL - Dividend Comparison

ALM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ALM
Almonty Industries Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
3.97%6.76%5.44%6.14%12.78%

Financials

ALM vs. CBL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Almonty Industries Inc. and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
25.40M
145.97M
(ALM) Total Revenue
(CBL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ALM values in CAD, CBL values in USD

ALM vs. CBL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Almonty Industries Inc. and CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.2%
62.6%
Portfolio components
ALM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.01M and revenue of 25.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

CBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.34M and revenue of 145.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.

ALM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 2.24M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

CBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 72.75M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.8%.

ALM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a net income of -5.26M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in a net margin of -20.7%.

CBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 45.40M and revenue of 145.97M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALM and CBL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALM has higher volatility (25.56%) compared to CBL (10.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALM dropped -43.88% vs CBL's -34.02%.

CBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALM and CBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer