ALLW vs. TDSC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC).

ALLW and TDSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ALLW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Mar 5, 2025. TDSC is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Sep 16, 2020.

Performance

ALLW vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALLW vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.95%	15.04%
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	3.10%	5.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than TDSC's 3.10% return.

ALLW

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDSC

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: -3.51%
• YTD: 3.10%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLW vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.

ALLW

SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF

TDSC

Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF

Return for Risk

ALLW vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW

ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 84
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

TDSC

TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 28
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 31
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALLW	TDSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	0.58	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	0.79	+1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.13	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	0.62	+1.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	2.23	+7.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALLW vs. TDSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the TDSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and TDSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALLW	TDSC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	0.58	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	0.28	+1.24

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and TDSC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALLW vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than TDSC's 2.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.45%	4.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	2.17%	2.92%	2.06%	2.06%	1.76%	1.11%	0.54%

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum TDSC drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and TDSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALLW	TDSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-21.51%	+12.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-12.13%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.28%	-3.72%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-9.65%	+8.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	3.39%	-1.37%

Volatility

ALLW vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) at 3.72%. This indicates that ALLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALLW	TDSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	3.72%	+1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	7.10%	+1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.08%	12.43%	+0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	10.32%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.83%	10.29%	+2.54%