ALIL vs. SCDS
ALIL (Argent Focused Small Cap ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ALIL returned 12.05% vs 42.67% for SCDS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALIL charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.
Performance
ALIL vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALIL achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 22.66% return.
ALIL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDS
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 21.54%
- 1Y
- 42.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALIL vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 7.70% | 6.88% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 22.66% | 27.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALIL and SCDS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ALIL and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALIL vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank
ALIL
SCDS
ALIL vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALIL | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.40 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 4.84 | -3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 16.84 | -14.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALIL | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 2.36 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.11 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
ALIL vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALIL drawdown since its inception was -12.60%, smaller than the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIL and SCDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALIL | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.60% | -26.71% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -8.85% | -3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.76% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -5.28% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 2.54% | +1.78% |
Volatility
ALIL vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALIL | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 5.58% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 12.93% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 18.20% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 21.20% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 21.20% | -2.28% |
ALIL vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALIL has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALIL vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison
ALIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SCDS's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 0.44% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.92% | 1.15% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ALIL and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ALIL has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to SCDS (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIL dropped -12.60% vs SCDS's -26.71%.
On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 42.67% vs 12.05% for ALIL. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 42.67% return vs 12.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.
SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.44% for ALIL.
They also come from different issuers: Argent and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ALIL and 0.40% for SCDS.
SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALIL and SCDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer