ALIL vs. FESM
ALIL (Argent Focused Small Cap ETF) and FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ALIL returned 12.05% vs 46.73% for FESM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALIL charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FESM.
Performance
ALIL vs. FESM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALIL achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 19.64% return.
ALIL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FESM
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALIL vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 7.70% | 6.88% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 19.64% | 35.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALIL and FESM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ALIL and FESM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALIL vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank
ALIL
FESM
ALIL vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALIL | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.41 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 4.61 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 16.60 | -13.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALIL | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 2.48 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.29 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
ALIL vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALIL drawdown since its inception was -12.60%, smaller than the maximum FESM drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIL and FESM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALIL | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.60% | -26.93% | +14.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -10.18% | -2.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -1.59% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -4.79% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 2.82% | +1.50% |
Volatility
ALIL vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALIL | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 5.64% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 13.32% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 18.98% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 21.26% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 21.26% | -2.34% |
ALIL vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALIL has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALIL vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison
ALIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FESM's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 0.44% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALIL and FESM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FESM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to ALIL (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIL dropped -12.60% vs FESM's -26.93%.
On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 46.73% vs 12.05% for ALIL. On fees, FESM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 46.73% return vs 12.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FESM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.
FESM has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.44% for ALIL.
They also come from different issuers: Argent and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ALIL and 0.28% for FESM.
FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALIL and FESM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer