PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALFAX vs. RYVPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALFAX achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than RYVPX's 19.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ALFAX has underperformed RYVPX with an annualized return of 11.33%, while RYVPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


ALFAX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.98%
YTD
22.34%
6M
19.97%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
11.33%

RYVPX

1D
0.65%
1M
6.16%
YTD
19.38%
6M
16.40%
1Y
37.63%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
22.34%8.80%13.18%13.92%-23.50%15.01%26.16%24.95%-9.72%20.61%
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
19.38%19.53%21.81%16.97%-32.45%6.61%49.45%23.68%-10.81%17.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ALFAX and RYVPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001

0.92

The correlation between ALFAX and RYVPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALFAX vs. RYVPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALFAX
ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

RYVPX
RYVPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RYVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALFAXRYVPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.55

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

8.41

+5.21

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the RYVPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALFAX and RYVPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALFAX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, roughly equal to the maximum RYVPX drawdown of -59.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALFAX and RYVPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALFAXRYVPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-59.03%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-15.22%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-25.76%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-48.19%

+14.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-48.19%

+7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-13.15%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

4.61%

-1.91%

Volatility

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) have volatilities of 6.76% and 6.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALFAXRYVPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

6.93%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

15.99%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

20.95%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

26.39%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

25.01%

-4.22%

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALFAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RYVPX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALFAX vs. RYVPX - Dividend Comparison

ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than RYVPX's 14.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
4.34%5.30%0.80%0.46%6.94%5.38%7.99%14.66%16.61%11.96%11.85%15.83%
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
14.06%16.79%2.92%0.00%4.34%34.97%10.32%3.47%45.66%20.89%11.40%24.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ALFAX and RYVPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RYVPX has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to ALFAX (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALFAX dropped -57.11% vs RYVPX's -59.03%.

ALFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALFAX and RYVPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer