ALBAX vs. AHSAX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ALBAX (Alger Growth & Income Fund) and AHSAX (Alger Health Sciences Fund) are both mutual funds - ALBAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Alger, while AHSAX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past 10 years, ALBAX returned 15.52%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for AHSAX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALBAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for AHSAX.

Performance

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALBAX achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than AHSAX's 5.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ALBAX has outperformed AHSAX with an annualized return of 15.52%, while AHSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.

ALBAX

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 29.00%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: 14.24%
• 10Y*: 15.52%

AHSAX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 5.20%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 6M: 3.66%
• 1Y: 28.30%
• 3Y*: 5.14%
• 5Y*: -1.95%
• 10Y*: 9.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund	11.26%	19.89%	21.81%	22.60%	-14.12%	30.79%	15.22%	28.92%	-4.72%	20.18%
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund	5.57%	10.14%	1.17%	-4.26%	-17.04%	3.26%	30.99%	22.02%	5.71%	33.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ALBAX and AHSAX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between ALBAX and AHSAX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ALBAX vs. AHSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALBAX

ALBAX Risk / Return Rank: 82
ALBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ALBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ALBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ALBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ALBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AHSAX

AHSAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
AHSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
AHSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AHSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AHSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AHSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALBAX	AHSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	1.90	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.71	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.32	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	3.10	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.16	9.51	+7.64

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the AHSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALBAX and AHSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum AHSAX drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBAX and AHSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALBAX	AHSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.56%	-46.23%	+5.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.86%	-9.67%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.65%	-23.11%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.06%	-45.04%	+22.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.26%	-45.04%	+10.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-23.22%	+20.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-14.73%	+7.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	3.15%	-1.37%

Volatility

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) is 4.49%, while Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that ALBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALBAX	AHSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	5.67%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	12.43%	-2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.62%	15.79%	-3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.59%	24.16%	-8.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	23.33%	-6.07%

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALBAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than AHSAX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALBAX vs. AHSAX - Dividend Comparison

ALBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while AHSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	27.18%	11.68%	6.98%	7.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund	0.73%	0.74%	1.08%	0.98%	1.24%	4.17%	2.55%	5.00%	6.75%	2.35%	1.56%	3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALBAX and AHSAX in my portfolio?

ALBAX and AHSAX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALBAX or AHSAX?

AHSAX has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to ALBAX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALBAX dropped -40.56% vs AHSAX's -46.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.