ALBAX vs. GSPKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX).
ALBAX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Dec 31, 1996. GSPKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 31, 2005.
Performance
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | -4.27% | 19.89% | 21.81% | 22.60% | -14.12% | 30.79% | 15.22% | 28.92% | -4.72% | 20.18% |
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | -6.00% | 13.60% | 29.55% | 21.39% | -15.20% | 22.79% | 14.15% | 25.11% | -6.29% | 15.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALBAX achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly higher than GSPKX's -6.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ALBAX has outperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 13.60%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.
ALBAX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
GSPKX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -6.00%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALBAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALBAX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank
ALBAX
GSPKX
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALBAX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.72 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.15 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.73 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 3.78 | +3.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALBAX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.72 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.66 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.68 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.50 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALBAX and GSPKX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison
ALBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than GSPKX's 7.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | 0.95% | 0.74% | 1.08% | 0.98% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 2.55% | 5.00% | 6.75% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.75% |
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 7.03% | 6.32% | 12.77% | 6.48% | 6.33% | 6.01% | 7.19% | 6.86% | 7.95% | 6.13% | 5.63% | 6.29% |
Drawdowns
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum GSPKX drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBAX and GSPKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALBAX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -51.90% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -12.04% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -22.34% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.26% | -32.70% | -1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -7.83% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -6.04% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 2.44% | -0.08% |
Volatility
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) have volatilities of 4.09% and 3.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALBAX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 3.95% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 7.66% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 16.71% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 15.95% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 16.88% | +0.32% |