ALBAX vs. GSPKX
ALBAX (Alger Growth & Income Fund) and GSPKX (Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ALBAX returned 15.46%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for GSPKX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALBAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for GSPKX.
Performance
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALBAX achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than GSPKX's 10.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ALBAX has outperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 15.46%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.09% annualized return.
ALBAX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 33.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
GSPKX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | 13.01% | 19.89% | 21.81% | 22.60% | -14.12% | 30.79% | 15.22% | 28.92% | -4.72% | 20.18% |
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 10.12% | 13.60% | 29.55% | 21.39% | -15.20% | 22.79% | 14.15% | 25.11% | -6.29% | 15.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALBAX and GSPKX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ALBAX and GSPKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALBAX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank
ALBAX
GSPKX
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALBAX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 3.10 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.61 | 15.48 | +3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum GSPKX drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBAX and GSPKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALBAX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -51.90% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -7.83% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.65% | -20.51% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -22.34% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.26% | -32.70% | -1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.30% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -5.98% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.56% | +0.21% |
Volatility
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) at 3.52%. This indicates that ALBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALBAX | GSPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 3.52% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 8.34% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 10.22% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 16.05% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 16.92% | +0.36% |
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALBAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison
ALBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than GSPKX's 6.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALBAX Alger Growth & Income Fund | 0.72% | 0.74% | 1.08% | 0.98% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 2.55% | 5.00% | 6.75% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.75% |
GSPKX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund | 6.00% | 6.32% | 12.77% | 6.48% | 6.33% | 6.01% | 7.19% | 6.86% | 7.95% | 6.13% | 5.63% | 6.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ALBAX and GSPKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ALBAX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GSPKX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALBAX dropped -40.56% vs GSPKX's -51.90%.
ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALBAX and GSPKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer