PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALBAX vs. GSPKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALBAX achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than GSPKX's 10.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ALBAX has outperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 15.46%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.09% annualized return.


ALBAX

1D
1.19%
1M
0.96%
YTD
13.01%
6M
12.68%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
15.10%
10Y*
15.46%

GSPKX

1D
0.96%
1M
1.12%
YTD
10.12%
6M
9.88%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
13.19%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
13.01%19.89%21.81%22.60%-14.12%30.79%15.22%28.92%-4.72%20.18%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
10.12%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ALBAX and GSPKX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.95

The correlation between ALBAX and GSPKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALBAX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALBAX
ALBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ALBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALBAXGSPKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.10

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.61

15.48

+3.13

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the GSPKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALBAX and GSPKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum GSPKX drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBAX and GSPKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALBAXGSPKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-51.90%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-7.83%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-20.51%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

-22.34%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.26%

-32.70%

-1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.30%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-5.98%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.56%

+0.21%

Volatility

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) at 3.52%. This indicates that ALBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALBAXGSPKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.52%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

8.34%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

10.22%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

16.05%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

16.92%

+0.36%

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALBAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALBAX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison

ALBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than GSPKX's 6.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
0.72%0.74%1.08%0.98%1.24%4.17%2.55%5.00%6.75%2.35%1.56%3.75%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
6.00%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ALBAX and GSPKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ALBAX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GSPKX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALBAX dropped -40.56% vs GSPKX's -51.90%.

ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALBAX and GSPKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer