PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ALAU.L is traded in USD, while ACWL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ACWL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAU.L achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than ACWL.L's 11.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ALAU.L has underperformed ACWL.L with an annualized return of 7.95%, while ACWL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


ALAU.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
10.04%
6M
8.67%
1Y
37.31%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
7.95%

ACWL.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
4.57%
YTD
11.94%
6M
12.98%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America
10.04%54.14%-26.41%31.12%13.78%-9.59%-8.76%9.52%-8.57%24.51%
ACWL.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
11.94%21.83%19.36%17.72%-16.89%20.41%14.43%19.77%-1.48%19.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAU.L and ACWL.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2015

0.19

Over the past year, ALAU.L and ACWL.L have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALAU.L
ACWL.L

Financial Services

30.3%
16.2%

Basic Materials

19.7%
3.7%

Energy

11.7%
4.2%

Industrials

10.8%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
5.0%

Utilities

8.5%
2.6%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
9.3%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.8%

Healthcare

1.4%
8.1%

Technology

0.7%
29.3%

Financial Services

ALAU.L
30.3%
ACWL.L
16.2%

Basic Materials

ALAU.L
19.7%
ACWL.L
3.7%

Energy

ALAU.L
11.7%
ACWL.L
4.2%

Industrials

ALAU.L
10.8%
ACWL.L
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

ALAU.L
9.9%
ACWL.L
5.0%

Utilities

ALAU.L
8.5%
ACWL.L
2.6%

Communication Services

ALAU.L
4.0%
ACWL.L
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ALAU.L
1.6%
ACWL.L
9.3%

Real Estate

ALAU.L
1.6%
ACWL.L
1.8%

Healthcare

ALAU.L
1.4%
ACWL.L
8.1%

Technology

ALAU.L
0.7%
ACWL.L
29.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAU.L
ALAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWL.L
ACWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALAU.LACWL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.45

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.97

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

13.57

-4.86

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAU.L and ACWL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALAU.LACWL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.50

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.27

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

1.99

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.79

-1.32

Drawdowns

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAU.L drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, which is greater than ACWL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAU.L and ACWL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAU.LACWL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-25.82%

-26.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-9.55%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.25%

-17.33%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

-25.82%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.94%

-25.82%

-26.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.90%

-0.53%

-11.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.55%

-2.78%

-8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

2.10%

+2.17%

Volatility

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) at 3.39%. This indicates that ALAU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAU.LACWL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

3.39%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

8.73%

+8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.13%

11.37%

+8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.18%

21.89%

+8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.65%

28.21%

+17.44%

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALAU.L vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAU.L nor ACWL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAU.L and ACWL.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWL.L.

ALAU.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ACWL.L is Global Equities. ALAU.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ALAU.L and 0.45% for ACWL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAU.L and ACWL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer