PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L).

ALAU.L and DLTM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ALAU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. DLTM.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Oct 15, 2007. Both ALAU.L and DLTM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America		16.73%54.14%-26.41%31.12%13.78%-9.59%-8.76%9.52%-8.57%24.51%
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF		16.99%54.43%-26.89%33.42%7.99%-9.75%-11.20%12.80%-5.26%21.02%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ALAU.L having a 16.73% return and DLTM.L slightly higher at 16.99%. Over the past 10 years, ALAU.L has outperformed DLTM.L with an annualized return of 8.96%, while DLTM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.

ALAU.L

1D
3.15%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
16.73%
6M
27.99%
1Y
58.51%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
8.96%

DLTM.L

1D
3.25%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
16.99%
6M
27.85%
1Y
58.01%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
8.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MSCI Em Latin America

iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF

Often compared with ALAU.L:
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.LALAU.L vs. XMBR.LALAU.L vs. ALAG.LALAU.L vs. FVUB.LALAU.L vs. LTAM.LALAU.L vs. IBZL.LALAU.L vs. 100D.L
Often compared with DLTM.L:
DLTM.L vs. EWWDLTM.L vs. ^GSPCDLTM.L vs. ILFDLTM.L vs. EMVL.LDLTM.L vs. ALAG.LDLTM.L vs. XMBR.LDLTM.L vs. XMLA.L

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DLTM.L's 0.74% expense ratio.

DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America

Return for Risk

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ALAU.L
ALAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
DLTM.L
DLTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ALAU.LDLTM.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

2.63

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

3.26

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

4.73

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.76

16.02

-0.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the DLTM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAU.L and DLTM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ALAU.LDLTM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.63

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.59

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.30

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.07

+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between ALAU.L and DLTM.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Dividend Comparison

ALAU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DLTM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DLTM.L
iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF		3.03%3.54%5.77%4.23%6.82%3.20%1.66%2.31%2.17%1.47%1.44%2.98%

Drawdowns

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAU.L drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum DLTM.L drawdown of -64.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAU.L and DLTM.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ALAU.LDLTM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-64.38%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-12.29%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

-29.02%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.94%

-54.87%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-3.85%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-30.06%

+18.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

3.63%

-0.03%

Volatility

ALAU.L vs. DLTM.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and iShares MSCI EM Latin America UCITS ETF (DLTM.L) have volatilities of 8.89% and 9.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ALAU.LDLTM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

9.01%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.15%

16.14%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.74%

21.99%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.90%

22.71%

+8.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.99%

26.66%

+20.33%