ACWL.L vs. SPPW.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW.DE).
ACWL.L and SPPW.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACWL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. SPPW.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Feb 28, 2019. Both ACWL.L and SPPW.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACWL.L or SPPW.DE.
Key characteristics
| ACWL.L | SPPW.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.00% | 24.55% |
| 1Y Return | 24.53% | 32.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.64% | 9.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 22.55% | 13.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.55 | 2.89 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.55 | 3.86 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.49 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.98 | 3.81 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.73 | 18.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.42% | 1.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.86% | 10.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.03% | -33.69% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWL.L and SPPW.DE is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ACWL.L vs. SPPW.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ACWL.L achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly lower than SPPW.DE's 24.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACWL.L vs. SPPW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWL.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPPW.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACWL.L vs. SPPW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACWL.L vs. SPPW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWL.L nor SPPW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ACWL.L vs. SPPW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWL.L drawdown since its inception was -16.03%, smaller than the maximum SPPW.DE drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWL.L and SPPW.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACWL.L vs. SPPW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SPPW.DE) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.