ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L).
ALAU.L and XMLA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ALAU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. XMLA.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Jun 22, 2007. Both ALAU.L and XMLA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAU.L Amundi MSCI Em Latin America | 16.73% | 54.14% | -26.41% | 31.12% | 13.78% | -9.59% | -8.76% | 9.52% | -8.57% | 24.51% |
XMLA.L Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 15.73% | 58.38% | -29.33% | 25.59% | 3.20% | -18.67% | -13.94% | 16.58% | -6.75% | 21.75% |
Different Trading Currencies
ALAU.L is traded in USD, while XMLA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMLA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAU.L achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly higher than XMLA.L's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ALAU.L has outperformed XMLA.L with an annualized return of 8.96%, while XMLA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.55% annualized return.
ALAU.L
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 16.73%
- 6M
- 27.99%
- 1Y
- 58.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
XMLA.L
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 24.80%
- 1Y
- 57.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALAU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMLA.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L — Risk / Return Rank
ALAU.L
XMLA.L
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALAU.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | 2.68 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | 3.39 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 5.25 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.76 | 15.23 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALAU.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.68 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.36 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.21 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.02 | +0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAU.L and XMLA.L is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAU.L nor XMLA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAU.L drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum XMLA.L drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAU.L and XMLA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAU.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -59.62% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -9.37% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | -30.25% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.94% | -49.07% | -2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | -1.95% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.81% | -25.36% | +13.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 3.07% | +0.53% |
Volatility
ALAU.L vs. XMLA.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) have volatilities of 8.89% and 8.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALAU.L | XMLA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 8.99% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 15.41% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 21.57% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 22.88% | +8.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.99% | 26.43% | +20.56% |